Jump to content
Show header slider

ELECTRIC SIGN SUPPLIES
If You're Looking For Premium Electric Sign Industry Components From Trim Cap, LED's, Neon Supplies, Power Supplies, Pattern Paper.  Then Please Visit Our Online Store or Feel Free To Call Us For Inquiries or Placing an Order!!
Buy Now

SIGN INSTALLER MAP
Looking for a fellow Sign Syndicate Company Member For A Sign Install or Maintenance Call?
Click Here

For Sign Company's Who Work As Subcontractors
Before You Work For A National Sign & Service Company You Need To Look At The Reviews Of These Companies Before You Work For Them. Learn When To Expect Payment From Them and What It's Like To Work For Them, The Good, The Bad, The Ugly. Learn and Share Your Experiences Yourself For Others
Click Here

Grant Street electronic billboard denied in court

Erik Sine

By Erik Sine
in News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Erik Sine Master Engineer

Erik Sine

Posted
Posted

Grant Street electronic billboard denied in court

Friday, June 26, 2009

By Ed Blazina, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Lamar Advertising won't be flashing messages any time soon on its proposed electronic billboard Downtown.

Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Joseph M. James on Wednesday upheld the city Zoning Hearing Board's decision to deny the controversial billboard that has been a lightning rod for more than two years.

The billboard, which initially was approved administratively with no public hearing process, led to the resignation of the head of the city Urban Redevelopment Authority and a flurry of lawsuits over how it was handled.

Neither Lamar executives nor the company's attorney could be reached for comment on whether the company will appeal the decision or remove the partially installed billboard.

Lamar had already begun work on the 19-by-58-foot LED sign, expected to cost upwards of $1 million, at the new Grant Street Transportation Center when the project was stopped by complaints. The center, featuring two parking garages and the Greyhound bus terminal at Grant Street and Liberty Avenue, is owned by the Pittsburgh Parking Authority.

Although the billboard would be larger than the limits for signs located Downtown, Lamar initially received over-the-counter approval for the billboard. The company said it was relying on what it considered a long-standing city policy allowing advertising companies to install an electronic billboard if it agreed to eliminate several vinyl boards.

The parking authority had approved it, too, but the project became controversial when it was revealed that URA executive director and parking authority member Pat Ford was friends with a top Lamar executive with whom he and his wife exchanged Christmas gifts.

As a compromise to end a series of lawsuits, Lamar agreed to stop the project and apply for permission to install the billboard through normal channels. After an extensive hearing before the zoning hearing board, the board voted 1-1 with one abstention on Dec. 19, effectively denying the project.

The decision also denied a 2.5-by-433-foot "ticker" scheduled for the face of the facility.

Lamar went to Common Pleas Court to challenge whether that split decision should act as a denial. Judge James ruled it should.

"It is well established in this Commonwealth that a tie vote of a governmental body constitutes a negative decision rather than the absence of a decision," he wrote.

Since the board held a proper hearing, there was no legal reason to overturn the 17-page decision written by board member Alice Mitinger, he said.

The controversy surrounding the billboard led to Mr. Ford's resignation from the URA and parking authority and raised questions about developers having undue influence on Mayor Luke Ravenstahl's administration.

Ms. Mitinger, whose term expired at the end of 2008, continued to serve on the board until she was replaced by the mayor this week.

You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. - Winston Churchill

 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rocco
      Fairmont signs

      By Rocco · Posted

      I didn't take the job.   And before I did anything for a company like them, I'd have to set up an ach block.   Otherwise, per my banker, it's possible that they can do a reverse ACH.   My bankers has been after me to set that up, though there is a monthly fee.   sigh, there's a monthly fee to just about anything with banks.   Paul, keeping busy i hope?    Rocco
    • paul321
      Fairmont signs

      By paul321 · Posted

      Take the Money 1st. ACH the money. Then do the job.  *** Credit Cards can be cancelled up to 18 months ***
    • Erik Sine
      Rant - Vendor paperwork is getting crazy

      By Erik Sine · Posted

      Wow, you will have to root through "their" protections.
    • Rocco
      Rant - Vendor paperwork is getting crazy

      By Rocco · Posted

      A national sign company that I've dealt with for at least twenty-five years wants us to sign their vendor packet again this year.   At first it was a few pages but grew over time.   Last year it was fifteen pages.   Now it's twenty-two pages., plus a three page NDA.   I will have someone look it over and give me their opinion but it's getting ridiculous.    Their paperwork pusher will say that its' all "standard things" but standard for who and in whose favor?   Even if they gave me a ton of work, and it's only been one or two jobs a year recently, I'd be hesitant.   if i didn't know someone that does contacts for a living, I'd have to pay an attorney to go over this packet.    This is a national that has a good rep but it's getting to the point that we all need an attorney on hand at all times to go over paperwork.    Rant over.
    • Erik Sine
      The Great White Hope IV - Year 1

      By Erik Sine · Posted

      This is the late April 2026 Update   This month we added in: GE's TX GEN4 12v .9w 6500K LED Module     G2G's WOW II Red 12V .72W     Also Including the GWH IV Snap Shot of the Project which is also included in the April Evaluation PDF Sheet.   The most important thing to take notice i2 the FC / Watt (Foot Candles per Watt).    This is the LED Chip Quality and Efficiency, this is the amount of Light Per Power.  The bigger the number the more efficient that Light Source is.  You might see a Higher Wattage LED Module with a low FC/Watt value, that means it's not too efficient....could even be pushed and in some cases over driven running hot, which can result in shorter life.   I'm going to drop an example to put things in perspective. Let's take two 2LED Modules...the Brighton - II, and the EveryLite Rebel LED Module.   The Brighton II is .8 watts, the EveryLite Rebel is almost a 1 watt Module at .96w   The 362 Foot Candle average EveryLiteRebel is brighter than the B-II Module at 348.5 FC AVG.  However the B-II Module has a 108.91 Foot Candle Per Watt Average.    So if we were to boost the Module Power of the Brighton - II and make it say, a .84w module instead of a .8w module then we can project the Brighton II Module with Foot Candle per Watt of 108.91 to have a Foot Candle Average of 365.93.   The .84w Brighton - II Module would be brighter, under driven, and more efficient than the .96w EveryLite Rebel.   Now the Flip Side...   If we made the .96w EveryLite Module to a .8w Module apples to apples to the Brighton - II Module, we can project the Foot Candle of the .8watt EveryLite Module would be 301.66 instead of the 362 FC Average.  You can see the Handicap here   So Boosting the power of so-so chips will give you more light for the "Wow" factor, but in some case is over driving, there is more heat involved....and like all electronics...they hate and fail with heat.  This is why a lot of LED MFG's recently make a 2 LED almost 1 watt Module and sell for $40 a bag....   Just something to take note of.....          On another Note, I will be taking down the TBA Vendor as the light is too low, and the Principal / Sloan Prism Module as it is dated   April's 2026 GWH IV Sheet GreatWhiteHope IV 042826 WOA.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...