Jump to content

ELECTRIC SIGN SUPPLIES
If You're Looking For Premium Electric Sign Industry Components From Trim Cap, LED's, Neon Supplies, Power Supplies, Pattern Paper.  Then Please Visit Our Online Store or Feel Free To Call Us For Inquiries or Placing an Order!!
Buy Now

SIGN INSTALLER MAP
Looking for a fellow Sign Syndicate Company Member For A Sign Install or Maintenance Call?
Click Here

For Sign Company's Who Work As Subcontractors
Before You Work For A National Sign & Service Company You Need To Look At The Reviews Of These Companies Before You Work For Them. Learn When To Expect Payment From Them and What It's Like To Work For Them, The Good, The Bad, The Ugly. Learn and Share Your Experiences Yourself For Others

Click Here

hydraulic pump stalls when descending


Recommended Posts

  • Board Patron

Hey guys!

I finally got most of my Versalift running nicely. All hydraulics smooth. However I've noticed that when descending (the main cylinder), the hydraulic pump really seems to put a lot of load on the engine - and it descents pretty jerky too.

None of the other controls seem to even slow down the engine driving the hydraulic pump. But descending nearly stalls it!

Any idea why this would be??? I would think the load/pressure would be greatest when raising the bucket with my heavy self in it. But the hydraulics just breeze through that task

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hard to say without seeing an actual hydraulic schematic for the unit, but if it's done properly it should be using a counterbalance valve to hold the load (you) up. For safety reasons a good system will never rely on the control valve to retain a load.

The counterbalance valve may be set too high. When lifting this isn't an issue as they have a freeflow check in that direction. (The unit isn't going to 'fall up'.) But on lowering the pump not only has to still hold up the load, but also has to overcome the pilot ratio in the counterbalance valve to make it open. This is why the pump will actually see a higher load when lowering than lifting.

Again, just assumptions without seeing the correct schematic for the machine...but that's the best I can muster off the top of my head.

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Board Patron

Hi Mike, thanks for your informative reply. It does have a counterbalance (holding) valve. It also has a flow control valve (you can see it just to the left of the holding valve in the schematic).

I've adjusted the flow-control, but it still seems to have a high load on the pump. I have not adjusted the holding valve, but the procedure in the manual says to extend the boom out all the way horizontally with a person in the bucket. You then adjust until the cylinder just holds this load without drifting down.

Does it sound like the holding valve is too high?

John

post-1174-0-71169400-1465846193.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could be. Are you able to get part numbers off of the load control valve?

The procedure described in the manual is a good way to field-set a counterbalance valve. Need to ensure that this is done with slightly greater than expected load on the valve... So if you're normally lifting a person and some stuff, set the valve with a person, some stuff, and a little more stuff.

The counterbalance valve is essentially a lockout/relief. If the pressure induced on it by the load (the boom, basket, people, supplies) is higher than the setting, the valve will open and drift down. That's why they say to set with the boom all the way out and someone in the basket. To put a higher load on it than it would see under normal operation. This ensures that it won't drift down unless it's overloaded.

Where CBV's get fun is in the pilot ratio. If you have a valve with a low pilot ratio, and it's set too high to begin with, the pressure the pump has to make to get it to open increases.

To make matters worse, the pilot pressure required also has to overcome back pressure in the return line at a 1:1 ratio. The way the flow control is plumbed between the CBV and the control valve, and in a 'meter-out' (controls flow on descent, not raise) the pressure drop over that flow control is directly additive...so things start to pile up, so to speak.

All these factors are why your machine appears to be 'laboriously driving' the boom down, rather than just controlling it's descent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, start with the flow control screwed in almost all the way...like all the way in then back off a quarter or half turn. Then set the CBV. Once your CBV is set, then back out the flow control to a safe but productive speed.It's possible that the cylinder is trying to descend faster than the pump can get it oil.

Edited by Muldo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gahhhh....the more I look at that schematic the less I like it. We usually spec control valves that have work ports open to tank in neutral when we're using things like CBV's and PO checks. This keeps pressure from getting trapped and causing erratic behavior. It also means you may have to engage the 'lower' function in order to even set the holding valve. Could be a fun ride for whoever is in the basket at the time.

I have to assume yours isn't the only machine on the planet with this plumbing setup, which means that it's out there and working elsewhere on other folks' machines. Everything I'm saying is based in general hydraulics, not machine specific. I suggest if a slight fiddle with the holding valve and flow control still don't work, to get someone at the manufacturer on the phone. It's definitely not setup how I would spec a system.

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks Gary, hope all is well...sorry I caught this late 😁
    • And have a great 52nd birthday bash tomorrow, Eric!
    • Sign Sales Hanson Sign Company, located on the beautiful Kitsap Peninsula in Washington State, has been in business since 1964.  We are known for the great care we take with clients and employees alike.  All our employees are long term and committed to fabricating and installing the best signs we can produce.  We take pride in our work! The Sign Sales representative will be responsible for A) Communicating with the customer to find their needs/wants and budget B) Communicating with our permit staff to find out what signage the customer is allowed to have per code for the particular location C) Communicating with our designer to get sketches of the sign to the customer. Also, Sales Representative will be responsible for pricing out each job to present the customer with a proposal and sign sketch. Sales Rep will maintain contact with customer to build trust and a long term relationship.  A large percentage of our customers are repeat customers or referrals from existing customers.  Requirements:  At least 3 years of sign-related employment.  Job type:  Full time, some overtime.  Hours are 7:30am to 4:00pm Monday – Friday.  Salary:  $30 -  per hour, negotiable depending on experience.  Benefits:  100% paid medical, dental, vision plan.  Matching 401K, paid vacation and holidays.  Drug testing and employment physical may be required.  Please visit our website at www.hansonsigns.com and send your resume to info@hansonsigns.com.
    • It's been a minute since I've been active on the Sign Syndicate I must admit.   Real Life activities along with how busy I have been with developing our Brighton LED Line have taken me away from keeping this site active.  I wasn't expecting the Brighton LED line to really take off as it has.  It's required a lot of attention and I'm purposely trying to keep product circle on who sells it small.  Quality is where my focus lays and not Quantity.  I have no desire to be the next Principal LED where I get to a point where I'm just selling off a name and let the product quality drop.   Since the Principal LED gobble up of the Sloan, Hanley the whole quality in the market place has turned to absolute Dog Shit.....and that is what Shops have been buying...Dog Shit...and they don't even know it   Over the last few years it's been a race to the bottom.   Wensco, Spandex, Montroy is raging over Principal LED dropping them as a supplier so their rage is focused on their United LED by G2G to complete against Principal / Sloan.    Then we have Everylite Raging over G2G which is nothing more than old G2G Employee/Partners splitting off to do their own thing as Everylite bitter at their previous place of buisiness or employment.  So Battle Lines are all over the market place and they're all competing for one thing...who can sell the Cheapest Module.   We've discussed a lot of this in ad nauseam      Chip quality in LED Modules has gone down and price has gone up with the big monopoly along with having fewer choices at the Sign Supplier...All a mixed bag in conjunction in who can sell quantity over quality.     This will all get very interesting, real fast         So.....I have a need fever, and the only prescription is...... more Benchmark Testing.         The Great White Hope IV   Just like the predecessors of the GWH III to the original we started back in 2009 we will test the Original Light output of various Vendor LEDs with similar spacing, monitor the Lumen Maintenance (Light Degradation over time) in measuring the Luminance in Foot Candles...or the light output on a sign face....as that is all we care about in the Electric Sign Industry     Project Great White Hope      We will also display one of the most important qualities when it comes to LED Chip quality that must be given attention too, that many either not know of, or really is never talked about because it cuts through all the Marketing Bullshit and that is the Foot Candles per Watt....this is the Chip Efficiency of an LED and this number will reflect how much light output you are getting for power put it.  The higher the FC/W, the better quality chip that LED has in it.  You can't get High Light Output from poor quality chips, only high quality chip have a higher efficiency to give you more light for lesser power.   For obvious reasons I will not be benchmarking every product out there on the market, just the most visible in the Market Place.     Project Tight Whitey     For example I will not be testing Principal LED's Synergy Mini or any in the family.    A .46w LED module with poor lumen per watt is not worth investing our time to test especially at nearly $400 per bag in cost.  To me it's a joke of a product, something with such low output that will last you a long time because it operates/drives too low but you will literally need two to two and a half of these modules that one single LED module will do.  So having four .46w modules next to four Qwik Mod II modules would look ridiculous next to one another in a benchmark comparison.    Also, a lot of Modules are being phased out....   Our current line up will be the following   United LEDs (G2G).8w for Channel Letters   United LEDs (G2G) 1.2w for Large Channel Letters & Cabinets Principal Hanley's The One 1w LED Principal Qwik Mod II .8w Principal Qwik Mod II .8w Red Principal Sloans Prism .96w LED G2G Wow .8w Module Everylite Rebel 1w Module Everylite 2D .72w Module   BrightON II .8w LED Module BrightON II .8w LED Module Ruby Red BrightON III 1.2w LED Module BrightON IV 1.6w LED Module BrightON SunFire 2.4w LED Module BrightON Lightning .68w LED Module BrightON Lightning .72w LED Module Ruby Red   A few more surprise Vendor Modules as we go along.   There is no better way to show the Electric Sign Industry and where we sit with the components we use in the signs we produce than creating a benchmark comparison   I should have this up and running in the next day or two, I will create a new topic and post here publicly for all to see and monitor over the next few years.   Like the previous Benchmarks, all LED Modules will be equally spaced for 2LED Modules, 3LED Modules, and 4LED Module.    All LED Modules will be in 5" Depth Channels that are 24" x 4.25".  Sign Faces will be 1/8" 7328 White by Plexiglas grade C and all will operate by a shared France Lighting Solutions TruPower LED PSU.    The only fault this benchmark comparison will have is that the budget Constant Voltage LEDs like the Qwik Mod II will be handy capped in Light Output because there will not be any remote slight voltage drop coming from a TruPower LED PSU that will affect the light output drop that would occur in real life setting should a LED PSU be loaded at 80 - 85%.  Constant Current LED Modules light output is not affected by slight voltage drops and remain consistent in lighting.   So, if we have one fault it lays here, but just know...all Constant Voltage LED modules would normally be a little dimmer in light for two reasons, TruPower LED Power Supply and for the fact that our PSU's will not be reaching anywhere near loadable capacity, and if we were to add modules down the road after initial start, it would affect these CC LED Modules Light Output in robbing voltage.       Great White Hope Monthly Benchmark Evaluation        The Reason I'm rebooting this much needed Benchmark Comparison for the Electric Sign Industry is for a couple of reasons.  Our Trade Needs this because too many Custom Sign Shops only knowledge base it dependent on what Sign Suppliers tell them...which is way too reliant on a poor source based on the importance on sales and who they sell now and not yesterday.  I also notice with Social Media which is another poor source of reliable knowledge, has been very incorrect and very biased based on who they sell and who their relationships are built around.  This simple Benchmark will shed light where there has a lot of poor light on the subject matter   This time with our own developed LED line will be in the mix, and of course it will be seeing as biased....in a sense it will come off that way....  But I always have encouraged custom sign shops to develop their own comparisons and really, REALLY see for themselves....as Seeing is BELIEVING        More to come......
×
  • Create New...